Original articles

Variation in calibration of hand‐held ultraviolet (UV) meters for psoralen plus UVA and narrow‐band UVB phototherapy

Article first published online: 22 Jun 2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05981.x

Comment on this article

Summary

Background  Phototherapy units should regularly use hand‐held ultraviolet (UV) meters to assess the output of treatment lamps, and these meters should be accurately calibrated. Several medical physics departments in the U.K. can calibrate UV meters traceable to national standards, but there is concern that there may be disagreement among departments. In particular, there may be difficulty in calibration for narrow‐band UVB phototherapy lamps (TL‐01).

Objectives  To ascertain the level of agreement in UV meter calibration at expert centres in the U.K., and to survey methodology at these centres, consider sources of errors and to make recommendations on calibration methods.

Methods  The same UV meter with two detectors (for UVA and UVB) was calibrated by seven medical physics departments. A questionnaire on methods was also distributed and measured spectral outputs from each centre were examined.

Results  The calibration factors for the meter varied by ± 18% for the UVA detector and by ± 60% for the UVB detector (2 standard deviations). Six centres performed calibration using a spectroradiometer and one centre used a reference meter method. The spectra of lamps used for calibration were similar. For the spectroradiometric methods there were some differences in methodology and instrumentation that may account for the differences in calibration factors.

Conclusions  UV meter calibration in the U.K. shows unacceptable variability, particularly for TL‐01 lamps. An accuracy of around of ± 10% would be clinically acceptable and should be technically achievable.

Read moreRead more (PDF)

Share this article

0

Favourite

Comments

If you want to submit a letter for publication rather than comment on an article please submit through Scholar One: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bjd

There are no comments for this article yet.

Recent Tweets

@BrJDermatol

08 Dec 2019

Are you a young dermatologist interested in joining the BJD as an editorial trainee? We have exciting opportunities for international trainees and trainees based in the UK/ Ireland. Find out more on the @HealthySkin4All website: https://t.co/DThtM6ybJV

@BrJDermatol

08 Dec 2019

An unusual case of mycosis fungoides with cerebral involvement, which achieved a durable complete remission after autologous stem-cell transplantation and interferon alfa-2a maintenance therapy. https://t.co/LCZbpZwDkc #CTCL #interferon https://t.co/UA8uMiBvI5

@BrJDermatol

07 Dec 2019

31M born in Cape Verde presented w/ 3/52 hx of 7cm bosselated & exulcerated plaque w/ rapid growth & bleeding, assoc. w/ wt loss, fatigue & occasional cough. PCR detected Bartonella spp DNA and also tested +ve for HIV. What's your diagnosis? https://t.co/vC2R8lz0zc #medderm #BJD https://t.co/d8f75TZbhn

@BrJDermatol

06 Dec 2019

This video gives some insight into novel disease pathomechanisms for the skin fragility disorder #RDEB (Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa) and identifies potential strategies to improve the disease course of RDEB #SkinFibrosis: https://t.co/JWtrG5jp8x

@BrJDermatol

06 Dec 2019

RT The British Association of Dermatologists @HealthySkin4All: New @BrJDermatol research investigated the genetic basis of fibrosis in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. This finding could lead to possible future treatment. https://t.co/WmYsCGncdW @CharityDEBRA @Wiley_Health https://t.co/wRgfgUk3jT

@BrJDermatol

06 Dec 2019

RT The Dermatology Clinic London @TheDermClinicUK: Does polygenic risk influence associations between sun exposure and #melanoma? A prospective cohort analysis published in @BrJDermatol: https://t.co/bISSmINuER #dermatology #skincancer

Close